AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted after Supreme Court declines to review the rule

Photo illustration of the Supreme Court building with pixelated sky.

The US Supreme Court has declined to hear a case over whether AI-generated art can obtain a copyright, as reported earlier by Reuters. The Monday decision comes after Stephen Thaler, a computer scientist from Missouri, appealed a court’s decision to uphold a ruling that found AI-generated art can’t be copyrighted.

In 2019, the US Copyright Office rejected Thaler’s request to copyright an image, called A Recent Entrance to Paradise, on behalf of an algorithm he created. The Copyright Office reviewed the decision in 2022 and determined that the image doesn’t include “human authorship,” disqualifying it from copyright protection.

After Thale …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.