Fine-tuned GPT-3.5 Performance: Praise Component Identification Results

Table of Links

Abstract and 1 Introduction

2. Background

2.1 Effective Tutoring Practice

2.2 Feedback for Tutor Training

2.3 Sequence Labeling for Feedback Generation

2.4 Large Language Models in Education

3. Method

3.1 Dataset and 3.2 Sequence Labeling

3.3 GPT Facilitated Sequence Labeling

3.4 Metrics

4. Results

4.1 Results on RQ1

4.2 Results on RQ2

5. Discussion

6. Limitation and Future Works

7. Conclusion

8. Acknowledgments

9. References


APPENDIX

A. Lesson Principles

B. Input for Fine-Tunning GPT-3.5

C. Scatter Matric of the Correlation on the Outcome-based Praise

D. Detailed Results of Fine-Tuned GPT-3.5 Model’s Performance

D. DETAILED RESULTS OF FINE-TUNED GPT-3.5 MODELS’ PERFORMANCE

Table 7: Detailed results of fine-tuned GPT-3.5 models on identifying praise components

:::info
This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY 4.0 DEED license.

:::

:::info
Authors:

(1) Jionghao Lin, Carnegie Mellon University (jionghal@cs.cmu.edu);

(2) Eason Chen, Carnegie Mellon University (easonc13@cmu.edu);

(3) Zeifei Han, University of Toronto (feifei.han@mail.utoronto.ca);

(4) Ashish Gurung, Carnegie Mellon University (agurung@andrew.cmu.edu);

(5) Danielle R. Thomas, Carnegie Mellon University (drthomas@cmu.edu);

(6) Wei Tan, Monash University (wei.tan2@monash.edu);

(7) Ngoc Dang Nguyen, Monash University (dan.nguyen2@monash.edu);

(8) Kenneth R. Koedinger, Carnegie Mellon University (koedinger@cmu.edu).

:::

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.