Table of Links
3 Method and 3.1 Phase 1: Taxonomy Generation
3.2 Phase 2: LLM-Augmented Text Classification
4 Evaluation Suite and 4.1 Phase 1 Evaluation Strategies
4.2 Phase 2 Evaluation Strategies
5.3 LLM-Augmented Text Classification
5.4 Summary of Findings and Suggestions
6 Discussion and Future Work, and References
A TAXONOMIES
The user intent taxonomy and conversation domain taxonomy used in the label assignment phase are provided in Tables 5 and 6. Note although the label name and the majority of label description are automatically generated through our TnT-LLM framework, we did perform a lightweight human calibration on these generated taxonomies and added artificial examples. These examples are purely for illustration purpose and do not link to any particular data point in our corpus.
:::info
This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 DEED license.
:::
:::info
Authors:
(1) Mengting Wan, Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation;
(2) Tara Safavi (Corresponding authors), Microsoft Corporation;
(3) Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Microsoft Corporation;
(4) Yujin Kim, Microsoft Corporation;
(5) Scott Counts, Microsoft Corporation;
(6) Jennifer Neville, Microsoft Corporation;
(7) Siddharth Suri, Microsoft Corporation;
(8) Chirag Shah, University of Washington and Work done while working at Microsoft;
(9) Ryen W. White, Microsoft Corporation;
(10) Longqi Yang, Microsoft Corporation;
(11) Reid Andersen, Microsoft Corporation;
(12) Georg Buscher, Microsoft Corporation;
(13) Dhruv Joshi, Microsoft Corporation;
(14) Nagu Rangan, Microsoft Corporation.
:::